Home About the Journal Latest Work Current Issue Archive Special Issues Editorial Board
<< Previous Next >>

2019, 1(2): 176-184

Published Date:2019-4-20 DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.2096-5796.2018.0014

Eye-around vibration haptics on VR immersion improvement


Due to the inherent shortcomings of the hardware, the immersion of visual interaction between the user and the virtual reality (VR) equipment is greatly reduced. In this paper, effects of eye-around vibration haptics on improving the VR immersion were studied. The vibration was generated by flexible vibrators whose performance was evaluated by a laser vibrometer. Fitting the vibrators on the human eye area at different positions and derived by different waveforms and frequencies of the input signal, the effects of vibration on the human vision and comfort of the users were verified. Then, with the selected input signals and fitting locations, different kinds of vibration were applied on the eye area cooperating with virtual reality images or videos to evaluate the changes of immersion. Research results provide references to the modeling of eye tactile feedback and the design of relevant tactile device in improving the VR immersion.


VR immersion ; Haptics ; Eye tactile feedback ; Vibration actuator

Cite this article

Tao ZENG, Keyu WEI, Yanlin YU, Yi ZHAO. Eye-around vibration haptics on VR immersion improvement. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2019, 1(2): 176-184 DOI:10.3724/SP.J.2096-5796.2018.0014


1. www. oculus. com/

2. Papachristos N M, Vrellis I, Mikropoulos T A. A Comparison between Oculus Rift and a Low-Cost Smartphone VR Headset: Immersive User Experience and Learning. In: 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). Timisoara, Romania, 2017, 477–481 DOI:10.1109/ICALT.2017.145

3. https: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Google_Cardboard

4. http: //www. samsung. com/global/galaxy/gear-vr/

5. http: //www. mojing. cn/

6. Powell W, Powell V, Brown P, Cook M, Uddin J. Getting around in google cardboard – exploring navigation preferences with low-cost mobile VR. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd Workshop on Everyday Virtual Reality (WEVR). Greenville, SC, USA, 2016, 5–8 DOI:10.1109/WEVR.2016.7859536

7. Dempsey P. VR at the olympics. Engineering & Technology, 2016, 11(7): 30–33 DOI:10.1049/et.2016.0701

8. https: //www. microsoft. com/microsoft-hololens/en-us

9. https: //www. magicleap. com/#/home

10. Furlan R. The future of augmented reality: Hololens-Microsoft's AR headset shines despite rough edges [Resources_Tools and Toys]. IEEE Spectrum, 2016, 53(6): 21 DOI:10.1109/mspec.2016.7473143

11. Perry T S. Augmented reality: forget the glasses. IEEE Spectrum, 2017, 54(1): 36–39 DOI:10.1109/mspec.2017.7802744

12. Suznjevic M, Mandurov M, Matijasevic M. Performance and QoE assessment of HTC Vive and Oculus Rift for pick-and-place tasks in VR. In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). Erfurt, Germany, 2017, 1–3 DOI:10.1109/QoMEX.2017.7965679

13. Conn M A, Sharma S. Immersive Telerobotics Using the Oculus Rift and the 5DT Ultra Data Glove. In: 2016 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS). Orlando, FL, USA, 2016, 387–391 DOI:10.1109/CTS.2016.0075

14. Ranade S, Zhang M, Al-Sada M, Urbani J, Nakajima T. Clash tanks: An investigation of virtual and augmented reality gaming experience. In: 2017 Tenth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Network (ICMU). Toyama, Japan, 2017, 1–6 DOI:10.23919/ICMU.2017.8330112

15. Chance S S, Gaunet F, Beall A C, Loomis J M. Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1998, 7(2): 168–178 DOI:10.1162/105474698565659

16. Laurel B. Virtual reality. Scientific American, 1995, 273 (3): 90

17. Bowman D A, Koller D, Hodges L F. Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In: Proceedings of IEEE 1997 Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality. Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1997, 45–52 DOI:10.1109/VRAIS.1997.583043

18. Wilson P T, Nguyen K, Harris A, Williams B. Walking in place using the Microsoft Kinect to explore a large VE. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry. Shenzhen, China, ACM, 2014: 27–33 DOI:10.1145/2670473.2670492

19. Zhang F, Chu S, Pan R, Ji N, Xi L. Double hand-gesture interaction for walk-through in VR environment. In: 2017 IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS). Wuhan, China, 2017, 539–544 DOI:10.1109/ICIS.2017.7960051

20. TactileLabs[EB/OL]. http: //tactilelabs. com/

21. https: //www. vive. com/cn/

22. Adrián B, Jorge L, Mariano A, Roberto L. Comparison of Oculus Rift and HTC Vive: Feasibility for Virtual Reality-Based Exploration, Navigation, Exergaming, and Rehabilitation. Games for Health Journal, 2018, 7(3): 151–156 DOI:10.1089/g4h.2017.0114


1. Dangxiao WANG, Yuan GUO, Shiyi LIU, Yuru ZHANG, Weiliang XU, Jing XIAO, Haptic display for virtual reality: progress and challenges Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(2): 136-162

2. Xiao LEI, Tingwei ZHANG, Kun CHEN, Jue ZHANG, Yue TIAN, Fang FANG, Lihan CHEN, Psychophysics of wearable haptic/tactile perception in a multisensory context Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(2): 185-200