Effects of using headset-delivered virtual reality in road safety research: A systematic review of empirical studies

Abstract

To reduce serious crashes, contemporary research leverages opportunities provided by technology. A potentially higher added value to reduce road trauma may be hidden in utilising emerging technologies, such as headset-delivered virtual reality (VR). However, there is no study to analyse the application of such VR in road safety research systematically. Using the PRISMA protocol, our study identified 39 papers presented at conferences or published in scholarly journals. In those sources, we found evidence of VR's applicability in studies involving different road users (drivers, pedestrians, cyclists and passengers). A number of articles were concerned with providing evidence around the potential adverse effects of VR, such as simulator sickness. Other work compared VR with conventional simulators. VR was also contributing to the emerging field of autonomous vehicles. However, few studies leveraged the opportunities that VR presents to positively influence the involved road users' behaviour. Based on our findings, we identified pathways for future research.

Keyword

Empirical evidence ; Headset ; Road safety ; Systematic review ; Virtual reality

Cite this article

Daniel VANKOV, David JANKOVSZKY. Effects of using headset-delivered virtual reality in road safety research: A systematic review of empirical studies. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2021, 3(5): 351-368 DOI:10.1016/j.vrih.2021.05.005

References

1. Grand View Research. Virtual Reality Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Device (HMD, GTD), By Technology (Semi & Fully Immersive, Non-immersive), ByComponent, ByApplication, ByRegion, And Segment Forecasts, 2020-2027. [2020-10-30]. Avalable from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/virtual-reality-vr-market

2. Wohlgenannt I, Simons A, Stieglitz S. Virtual reality. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2020, 62(5): 455–461 DOI:10.1007/s12599-020-00658-9

3. Oyelere S S, Bouali N, Kaliisa R, Obaido G, Yunusa A A, Jimoh E R. Exploring the trends of educational virtual reality games: a systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 2020, 7(1): 1–22 DOI:10.1186/s40561-020-00142-7

4. Technavio. Virtual Reality Market in Education Sector by Product, Enduser, and Geography Forecast and Analysis 2020-2024. [2020-10-30]. Avalable from https://www.technavio.com/report/virtual-reality-market-in-education-sector-industry-analysis

5. Rizzo A S, Koenig S T. Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime? Neuropsychology, 2017, 31(8): 877–899 DOI:10.1037/neu0000405

6. Steinberger F, Schroeter R, Lindner V, Fitz-Walter Z, Hall J, Johnson D. Zombies on the road: a holistic design approach to balancing gamification and safe driving. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Nottingham United Kingdom, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2015, 320–327 DOI:10.1145/2799250.2799260

7. Siliquini R, Piat S C, Alonso F, Druart A, Kedzia M, Mollica A, Siliquini V, Vankov D, Villerusa A, Manzoli L, Group T. A European study on alcohol and drug use among young drivers: the TEND by Night study design and methodology. BMC Public Health, 2010, 10, 205 DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-10-205

8. Hingson R, Heeren T, Levenson S, Jamanka A, Voas R. Age of drinking onset, driving after drinking, and involvement in alcohol related motor-vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2002, 34(1): 85–92 DOI:10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00002-1

9. Brookhuis K A, Waard D, Samyn N. Effects of MDMA (ecstasy), and multiple drugs use on (simulated) driving performance and traffic safety. Psychopharmacology, 2004, 173(3/4): 440–445 DOI:10.1007/s00213-003-1714-5

10. Brookhuis K A, de Waard D, Steyvers F J J M, Bijsterveld H. Let them experience a ride under the influence of alcohol; A successful intervention program? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2011, 43(3): 906–910 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.013

11. China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality White Paper. 2017. Avalable from https://www-file.huawei.com/-/media/corporate/pdf/ilab/vr-ar-en.pdf

12. Vankov D, Schroeter R, Twisk D. Can't simply roll it out: Evaluating a real-world virtual reality intervention to reduce driving under the influence. PLoS One, 2021, 16(4): e0250273 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0250273

13. Mulrow C. Systematic reviews: rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ, 1994, 309(6954): 597–599 DOI:10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597

14. Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk B M, Stillwell S B, Williamson K M. Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: part I. The American Journal of Nursing, 2010, 110(7): 47–52 DOI:10.1097/01.naj.0000383935.22721.9c

15. Liberati A, Altman D G, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche P C, Ioannidis J P A, Clarke M, Devereaux P J, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 2009, 6(7): e1000100 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

16. Norfleet D, Wagner J, Alexander K, Pidgeon P. Automotive driving simulators: research, education, and entertainment. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems, 2009, 2(1): 186–193 DOI:10.4271/2009-01-0533

17. De Winter J, van Leeuwen PM, Happee R. Advantages and disadvantages of driving simulators: A discussion. In: Proceedings of measuring behavior, 2012

18. Murano T, Yonekawa T, Aga M, Nagiri S. Development of high-performance driving simulator. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 2009, 2(1): 661–669 DOI:10.4271/2009-01-0450

19. Steinberger F, Proppe P, Schroeter R, Alt F. CoastMaster: an ambient speedometer to gamify safe driving. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Ann Arbor MI USA, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2016, 83–90 DOI:10.1145/3003715.3005412

20. Rahman R, Qiao F, Li Q, Yu L. Developing a smartphone based warning system application to enhance the safety at work zones. TranLIVE. University of Idaho, 2016. Avalable from https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32557/dot_32557_DS1.pdf

21. Hu X P, Deng J Q, Zhao J D, Hu W Y, Ngai E C H, Wang R F, Shen J, Liang M, Li X T, Leung V C M, Kwok Y K. SAfeDJ. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 2015, 12(1s): 1–24 DOI:10.1145/2808201

22. Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Haque M M, King M, Washington S. Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: a systematic review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 72: 360–380 DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2016.10.006

23. Lang Y N, Wei L, Xu F, Zhao Y B, Yu L F. Synthesizing personalized training programs for improving driving habits via virtual reality. 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2018, 297–304 DOI:10.1109/vr.2018.8448290

24. Vankov D, Kaufmann C. IMPACT—Traffic safety campaigns for young people. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 2017, 8(1): 11–23 DOI:10.5507/tots.2017.003

25. Morina N, Ijntema H, Meyerbröker K, Emmelkamp P M G. Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2015, 74: 18–24 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.010

26. Garner T A. Reality check. In: Echoes of Other Worlds: Sound in Virtual Reality. Springer International Publishing, 2017, 213–254 DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-65708-0_7

27. Ingram K M, Espelage D L, Merrin G J, Valido A, Heinhorst J, Joyce M. Evaluation of a virtual reality enhanced bullying prevention curriculum pilot trial. Journal of Adolescence, 2019, 71: 72–83 DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.12.006

28. van Loon A, Bailenson J, Zaki J, Bostick J, Willer R. Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLoS One, 2018, 13(8): e0202442 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202442

29. Theng Y L, Lee J W, Patinadan P V, Foo S S. The use of videogames, gamification, and virtual environments in the self-management of diabetes: a systematic review of evidence. Games for Health Journal, 2015, 4(5): 352–361 DOI:10.1089/g4h.2014.0114

30. Ahn S J, Bailenson J N, Park D. Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 39: 235–245 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025

31. Schwebel D C, McClure L A, Porter B E. Experiential exposure to texting and walking in virtual reality: a randomized trial to reduce distracted pedestrian behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 102: 116–122 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.026

32. Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Truelove V, Watson B, Hinton J A. The impact of road advertising signs on driver behaviour and implications for road safety: a critical systematic review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 122: 85–98 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.012

33. Shekari Soleimanloo S. Effects of light and caffeine on human sleepiness and alertness: A simulated driving experiment. 2016. Avalable from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/95888/

34. Staton C, Vissoci J, Gong E Y, Toomey N, Hocker M. Road traffic injury prevention initiatives: a systematic review and metasummary of effectiveness in low and middle income countries. PLoS One, 2016, 11(1): e0144971 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0144971

35. Ropelato S, Zünd F, Magnenat S, Menozzi M, Sumner R, editors. Adaptive Tutoring on a Virtual Reality Driving Simulator. International SERIES on Information Systems and Management in Creative EMedia (CreMedia) , 2017(2), 12–17 DOI:10.3929/ethz-b-000195951

36. Gaibler F, Faber S, Edenhofer S, von Mammen S. Drink & drive: a serious but fun game on alcohol-induced impairments in road traffic. In: 2015 7th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games). Skovde, Sweden, IEEE, 2015, 1–5 DOI:10.1109/vs-games.2015.7295771

37. Fuest T, Schmidt E, Bengler K. Comparison of methods to evaluate the influence of an automated vehicle's driving behavior on pedestrians: wizard of oz, virtual reality, and video. Information, 2020, 11(6): 291 DOI:10.3390/info11060291

38. Deb S, Carruth D W, Hudson C R. How communicating features can help pedestrian safety in the presence of self-driving vehicles: virtual reality experiment. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2020, 50(2): 176–186 DOI:10.1109/thms.2019.2960517

39. Faulhaber A K, Dittmer A, Blind F, Wächter M A, Timm S, Sütfeld L R, Stephan A, Pipa G, König P. Human decisions in moral dilemmas are largely described by utilitarianism: virtual car driving study provides guidelines for autonomous driving vehicles. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2019, 25(2): 399–418 DOI:10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x

40. Helgath J, Braun P, Pritschet A, Schubert M, Böhm P, Isemann D. Investigating the effect of different autonomy levels on user acceptance and user experience in self-driving cars with a VR driving simulator. Design, User Experience, and Usability: Users, Contexts and Case Studies, 2018: 247–256 DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-91806-8_19

41. Ferrier-Barbut E, Vaufreydaz D, David J A, Lussereau J, Spalanzani A. Personal space of autonomous car's passengers sitting in the driver's seat. In: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Changshu, China, IEEE, 2018, 2022–2029 DOI:10.1109/ivs.2018.8500648

42. Rangelova S, Decker D, Eckel M, Andre E. Simulation sickness evaluation while using a fully autonomous car in a head mounted display virtual environment. In: Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Interaction, Navigation, Visualization, Embodiment, and Simulation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, 155–167 DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-91581-4_12

43. Leon René S, Ehinger BV, König P, Pipa G. How does the method change what we measure? Comparing virtual reality and text-based surveys for the assessment of moral decisions in traffic dilemmas. PLoS ONE, 14(10): e0223108 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0223108

44. Sütfeld L R, Gast R, König P, Pipa G. Using virtual reality to assess ethical decisions in road traffic scenarios: applicability of value-of-life-based models and influences of time pressure. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2017, 11: 122 DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00122

45. Sakhare A R, Yang V, Stradford J, Tsang I, Ravichandran R, Pa J. Cycling and spatial navigation in an enriched, immersive 3D virtual park environment: a feasibility study in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2019, 11: 218 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00218

46. Wang W, Singh K P, Chu Y T M, Huber A. Educating bicycle safety and fostering empathy for cyclists with an affordable and game-based VR app. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. Florence, Italy, ACM, 2016, 883–890 DOI:10.1145/2957265.2961846

47. Deb S, Carruth D W, Sween R, Strawderman L, Garrison T M. Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 65: 449–460 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.007

48. Walch M, Frommel J, Rogers K, Schüssel F, Hock P, Dobbelstein D, Weber M. Evaluating VR driving simulation from a player experience perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver Colorado, USA, ACM, 2017, 2982–2989 DOI:10.1145/3027063.3053202

49. Cao S, Nandakumar K, Babu R, Thompson B. Game play in virtual reality driving simulation involving head-mounted display and comparison to desktop display. Virtual Reality, 2020, 24(3): 503–513 DOI:10.1007/s10055-019-00412-x

50. Mortimer M, Eugene A, Thomson S, Seyedmahmoudian M, Horan B. Hector-VR®: a mixed-reality driving simulator for older drivers. In: 2019 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering (SoSE). Anchorage, AK, USA, IEEE, 2019, 200–205 DOI:10.1109/sysose.2019.8753836

51. Jakarta, Surabaya, Bali, Indonesia, ACM, 2019, 142–146 DOI:10.1145/3328243.3328261

52. Gąsiorek K, Odachowska E, Matysiak A, Pędzierska M. Virtual reality technologies in the training of professional drivers. comparison of the 2D and 3D simulation application. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, 133–142 DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-27687-4_14

53. Agrawal R, Knodler M, Fisher D L, Samuel S. Advanced virtual reality based training to improve young drivers′ latent hazard anticipation ability. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2017, 61(1): 1995–1999 DOI:10.1177/1541931213601994

54. Agrawal R, Knodler M, Fisher D L, Samuel S. Virtual reality headset training: can it be used to improve young drivers′ latent hazard anticipation and mitigation skills. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018, 2672(33): 20–30 DOI:10.1177/0361198118758311

55. Bogacz M, Hess S, Calastri C, Choudhury C F, Erath A, van Eggermond M A B, Mushtaq F, Nazemi M, Awais M. Comparison of cycling behavior between keyboard-controlled and instrumented bicycle experiments in virtual reality. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020, 2674(7): 244–257 DOI:10.1177/0361198120921850

56. Spain Barcelona, York New, NY, USA, ACM, 2019, 1–5 DOI:10.1145/3343036.3343138

57. Brown B, Park D, Sheehan B, Shikoff S, Solomon J, Yang J, Kim I. Assessment of human driver safety at Dilemma Zones with automated vehicles through a virtual reality environment. In: 2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). Charlottesville, VA, USA, IEEE, 2018, 185–190 DOI:10.1109/sieds.2018.8374733

58. Chen K B, Xu X, Lin J H, Radwin R G. Evaluation of older driver head functional range of motion using portable immersive virtual reality. Experimental Gerontology, 2015, 70: 150–156 DOI:10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.010

59. Cherix R, Carrino F, Piérart G, Khaled O A, Mugellini E, Wunderle D. Training pedestrian safety skills in youth with intellectual disabilities using fully immersive virtual reality—A feasibility study. In: HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Driving Behavior, Urban and Smart Mobility. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, 161–175 DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-50537-0_13

60. Cutello C A, Gummerum M, Hanoch Y, Hellier E. Evaluating an intervention to reduce risky driving behaviors: taking the fear out of virtual reality. Risk Analysis, 2020 DOI:10.1111/risa.13643

61. Ojados Gonzalez D, Martin-Gorriz B, Ibarra Berrocal I, Macian Morales A, Adolfo Salcedo G, Miguel Hernandez B. Development and assessment of a tractor driving simulator with immersive virtual reality for training to avoid occupational hazards. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017, 143: 111–118 DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.008

62. González-Ortega D, Díaz-Pernas F J, Martínez-Zarzuela M, Antón-Rodríguez M. Comparative analysis of kinect-based and oculus-based gaze region estimation methods in a driving simulator. Sensors, 2020, 21(1): 1–26 DOI:10.3390/s2101002

63. Lieze M, Jelle V C, Benedicte D, Nico V D W, Mario M, van Dyck D. Using virtual reality to investigate physical environmental factors related to cycling in older adults: a comparison between two methodologies. Journal of Transport & Health, 2020, 19, 100921 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2020.100921

64. Madigan R, Romano R. Does the use of a head mounted display increase the success of risk awareness and perception training (RAPT) for drivers? Applied Ergonomics, 2020, 85, 103076 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103076

65. Mallaro S, Rahimian P, O'Neal E E, Plumert J M, Kearney J K. A comparison of head-mounted displays vs. large-screen displays for an interactive pedestrian simulator. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. Gothenburg Sweden, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2017, 1–4 DOI:10.1145/3139131.3139171

66. Morley D C, Lawrence G, Smith S. Virtual reality user experience as a deterrent for smartphone use while driving. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. Corfu Island Greece, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2016, 1–3 DOI:10.1145/2910674.2910696

67. Morrongiello B A, Corbett M, Milanovic M, Pyne S, Vierich R. Innovations in using virtual reality to study how children cross streets in traffic: evidence for evasive action skills. Injury Prevention, 2015, 21(4): 266–270 DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041357

68. Orfila O, Gruyer D, Judalet V, Revilloud M. Ecodriving performances of human drivers in a virtual and realistic world. In: 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Seoul, Korea (South), IEEE, 2015, 790–795 DOI:10.1109/ivs.2015.7225781

69. Pai Mangalore G, Ebadi Y, Samuel S, Knodler M A, Fisher D L. The promise of virtual reality headsets: can they be used to measure accurately drivers′ hazard anticipation performance? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019, 2673(10): 455–464 DOI:10.1177/0361198119847612

70. Pala P, Cavallo V, Dang N T, Granié M A, Schneider S, Maruhn P, Bengler K. Analysis of street-crossing behavior: comparing a CAVE simulator and a head-mounted display among younger and older adults. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 152: 106004 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106004

71. Schneider S, Maruhn P, Dang N T, Pala P, Cavallo V, Bengler K. Pedestrian crossing decisions in virtual environments: behavioral validity in CAVEs and head-mounted displays. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2021, 001872082098744 DOI:10.1177/0018720820987446

72. Vasiljevic J, Jovanov G, Radovanovic R, Jovanov N, Vranjes D, editors. Influence of virtual simulator on the change of views on behaviour in traffic case study. MCCSIS 2018–Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems; Proceedings of the International Conferences on e-Learning 2018, 2018

73. Wang H R, Gao Z, Shen T, Li F, Xu J, Schwebel D C. Roles of individual differences and traffic environment factors on children's street-crossing behaviour in a VR environment. Injury Prevention, 2020, 26(5): 417–423 DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043268

74. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179–211 DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

75. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory/Albert Bandura. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1986, 1986, 16(1): 617

76. Stigler M H, Neusel E, Perry C L. School-based programs to prevent and reduce alcohol use among youth. Alcohol Res Health, 2011, 34(2): 157–162

1. Yang LI, Dong WU, Jin HUANG, Feng TIAN, Hong'an WANG, Guozhong DAI, Influence of multi-modality on moving target selection in virtual reality Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(3): 303-315

2. Yang LI, Jin HUANG, Feng TIAN, Hong-An WANG, Guo-Zhong DAI, Gesture interaction in virtual reality Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(1): 84-112

3. Athirah SYAMIMI, Yiwei GONG, Ryan LIEW, VR industrial applications―A singapore perspective Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(5): 409-420

4. Jie GUO, Dongdong WENG, Yue LIU, Qiyong CHEN, Yongtian WANG, Analysis of teenagers' preferences and concerns regarding HMDs in education Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2021, 3(5): 369-382

5. Yijun LI, Miao WANG, Derong JIN, Frank STEINICKE, Qinping ZHAO, Effects of virtual environment and self-representations on perception and physical performance in redirected jumping Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2021, 3(6): 451-469

6. Susu HUANG, Daqing QI, Jiabin YUAN, Huawei TU, Review of studies on target acquisition in virtual reality based on the crossing paradigm Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(3): 251-264

7. Yukang YAN, Xin YI, Chun YU, Yuanchun SHI, Gesture-based target acquisition in virtual and augmented reality Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(3): 276-289

8. Yuan GAO, Le XIE, A review on the application of augmented reality in craniomaxillofacial surgery Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(1): 113-120

9. Yuan CHANG, Guo-Ping WANG, A review on image-based rendering Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(1): 39-54

10. Shiguang QIU, Shuntao LIU, Deshuai KONG, Qichang HE, Three-dimensional virtual-real mapping of aircraft autom-atic spray operation and online simulation monitoring Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(6): 611-621

11. Xu PENG, Zhenyu GAO, Yitong DING, Dongfeng ZHAO, Xiaoyu CHI, Study of ghost image suppression in polarized catadioptric virtual reality optical systems Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(1): 70-78

12. Zhiming HU, Sheng LI, Meng GAI, Temporal continuity of visual attention for future gaze prediction in immersive virtual reality Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(2): 142-152

13. Lihui HUANG, Siti Faatihah Binte Mohd TAIB, Ryan Aung BA, Zhe An GOH, Mengshan XU, Virtual reality research and development in NTU Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(5): 394-408

14. Stéphanie PHILIPPE, Alexis D. SOUCHET, Petros LAMERAS, Panagiotis PETRIDIS, Julien CAPORAL, Gildas COLDEBOEUF, Hadrien DUZAN, Multimodal teaching, learning and training in virtual reality: a review and case study Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(5): 421-442

15. Jia Ming LEE, Xinxing XIA, Clemen OW, Felix CHUA, Yunqing GUAN, VEGO: A novel design towards customizable and adjustable head-mounted display for VR Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(5): 443-453

16. Jingcheng QIAN, Yancong MA, Zhigeng PAN, Xubo YANG, Effects of Virtual-real fusion on immersion, presence, and learning performance in laboratory education Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(6): 569-584

17. Hengwei XU, Siru LI, Wenpeng SONG, Jiajun SUN, Xinli WU, Xiaoqi WANG, Wenzhen YANG, Zhigeng PAN, Abdennour EI RHALIBI, Thermal perception method of virtual chemistry experiments Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(4): 305-315

18. TJ MATTHEWS, Feng TIAN, Tom DOLBY, Interaction design for paediatric emergency VR training Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(4): 330-344

19. Hongxin ZHANG, Jin ZHANG, Xue YIN, Kan ZHOU, Zhigeng PAN, Abdennour EI RHALIBI, Cloud-to-end rendering and storage management for virtual reality in experimental education Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(4): 368-380

20. Xiang ZHOU, Liyu TANG, Ding LIN, Wei HAN, Virtual & augmented reality for biological microscope in experiment education Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(4): 316-329

21. Haoyu WANG, Jianhuang WU, A virtual reality based surgical skills training simulator for catheter ablation with real-time and robust interaction Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2021, 3(4): 302-314

22. Na ZHANG, Liwen TAN, Fengying LI, Bing HAN, Yifa XU, Development and application of digital assistive teaching system for anatomy Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2021, 3(4): 315-335

23. Xiaolong LIU, Lili WANG, Redirected jumping in virtual scenes with alleys Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2021, 3(6): 470-483

24. Liming WANG, Xianwei CHEN, Tianyang DONG, Jing FAN, Virtual climbing: An immersive upslope walking system using passive haptics Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2021, 3(6): 435-450

25. Dangxiao WANG, Yuan GUO, Shiyi LIU, Yuru ZHANG, Weiliang XU, Jing XIAO, Haptic display for virtual reality: progress and challenges Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(2): 136-162

26. Aiguo SONG, Liyue FU, Multi-dimensional force sensor for haptic interaction: a review Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(2): 121-135

27. Wenmin ZHU, Xiumin FAN, Yanxin ZHANG, Applications and research trends of digital human models in the manufacturing industry Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(6): 558-579

28. Mohammad Mahmudul ALAM, S. M. Mahbubur RAHMAN, Affine transformation of virtual 3D object using 2D localization of fingertips Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2020, 2(6): 534-555

29. Yuan WEI, Dongdong GUAN, Qiuchen WANG, Xiangxian LI, Yulong BIAN, Pu QIN, Yanning XU, Chenglei YANG, Virtual fire drill system supporting co-located collaboration Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2019, 1(3): 290-302

30. Xiaoxiong FAN, Yun CAI, Yufei YANG, Tianxing XU, Yike Li, Songhai ZHANG, Fanglue ZHANG, Detection of scene-irrelevant head movements via eye-head coordination information Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 2021, 3(6): 501-514